Unless and until there are specific provision in
the respective rules there will not be
any deemed confirmation in the services
after probation period is over. An employee is confirmed in the services
only after receiving the confirmation order.
( D D Memorial Secondary school vs J A J Vasu Sena , Supreme Court on 21-8-19 )
Thursday, August 22, 2019
Friday, August 2, 2019
Power of Magistrate to order the accused to give voice sample
The Honourable Supreme Court in case of Ritesh Sinha vs State of
U.P. Criminal
Appeal No..2003/ 2012 decided on 02/08/19 held that “until explicit provisions are engrafted in
the Code of Criminal Procedure by Parliament, a Judicial Magistrate must be
conceded the power to order a person to give a sample of his voice for the
purpose of investigation of a crime. Such power has to be conferred on a
Magistrate by a process of judicial interpretation and in exercise of
jurisdiction vested in this Court under Article 142 of the Constitution of
India” S.C. while upholding the constitution bench decision in case of Kathi Kalu Aughar held that ordering the
accused to give his voice sample is not voilative of article 20(3) of the
Indian Constitution. Now the legal position is settled that till the law is
made by the parliament Judicial Magistrate has power to order accused to give
his voice sample.
Tuesday, July 2, 2019
procedure of filling Anticipatory Bail Application in U.P.
Recently the U P Government has revived the provision for anticipatory bail in the State . The Allahabad High Court has issued notice containing the procedure for filling anticipatory bail application.
NOTICE
Learned
Counsels are requested to refer the Code of Criminal Procedure (Uttar Pradesh
Amendment) Act 2018 (UP Act 04/2019) UP Government Notification no.
1058(2)/LXIX-V-1-19-1(KA)-20-2018 dated 06-06-2019 for grant of Anticipatory
Bail under section 438 of Cr.P.C. to person apprehending arrest. In the above
matter, I have been directed to notify following direction of the Hon'ble Court
for :
(1) The application must bear Court
fee of Rs.5/- as prescribed for application.
(2) The application must be supported
by an affidavit of the person apprehending arrest.
(3) The Second paragraph of the
affidavit filed in support of the application must contain the reason to
believe that deponent apprehending arrest on accusation of a non bailable
offence with particulars i.e. Case Crime Number, Police Station, and Section(s)
under which arrest is apprehended, if the same is known to the deponent.
(4) The third paragraph of the
affidavit filed in support of the application must contain that apprehended
accusation does not fall under the offences provided under sub section (6) of
the section 438 CrPC.
(5) The fourth paragraph of the
affidavit filed in support of the application must contain that the deponent
has not filed any previous application under section 438 CrPC before this
Hon'ble Court either at Allahabad or Lucknow or before any other High Court in
India, pertaining to the same subject matter.
(6) The fifth paragraph of the
affidavit filed in support of the application must contain information as to
whether any application under section 438 CrPC has been moved before the Court
of Sessions having Jurisdiction and the status/result of that application and
must be substantiated with relevant documents.
Sd/- O.S.D. (J)
(Criminal)
01.07.2019
Thursday, June 6, 2019
Registration of FIR under section 482 Cr.P.C. on the orders of High Court.
The
Madras High Court in case of Sugesan Transport Pvt Limited vs Assistant Commissioner of Police, Crl O.P.
19197/2016 dated 27/9/2016 have issued following guidelines to be observed
by the Magistrate and Police in case of disposing or dealing with the
applications filed under section 156(3) Cr.P.C.
i A petition under Section 482, Cr.P.C. for a
direction to register an FIR on the complaint of the petitioner circumventing
the time table prescribed by the Supreme Court in Lalita Kumari-IV and V is not
maintainable.
ii This
Court directs all the Station House Officers in the State of Tamil Nadu and
Union Territory of Puducherry to receive any complaint relating to the
commission of cognizable offence by a common man and if the Station House
Officer wants to conduct a preliminary enquiry, he shall immediately issue a
CSR receipt (in case of Tamil Nadu) or issue a separate receipt (in case of
Union Territory of Puducherry) to the complainant and after making the
necessary entries in the Station General Diary, as directed by the Supreme
Court in Lalita Kumari-IV and V, conduct preliminary enquiry.
In Lalita Kumari-IV, the Supreme Court has
directed that after conducting preliminary enquiry, if the police come to the
conclusion that no FIR need be registered, a duty is cast upon the police to
furnish a copy of the closure report to the complainant. After getting the
closure report, it is open to the complainant to file a petition under Section
156(3) Cr.P.C. or private complaint under Section 190 read with Section 200
Cr.P.C. disclosing the facts and persuading the Magistrate to take cognizance
of the offence. Such a petition/private complaint should disclose the closure
report of the police. After taking cognizance of the offence, the Magistrate
can also order police investigation under Section 202, Cr.P.C. to a limited
extent. The closure report cannot be subject to judicial review under Section
482, Cr.P.C.
iii If the Station House Officer refuses to
receive the complaint, the complainant shall send the complaint together with a
covering letter to the Superintendent of Police/Deputy Commissioner of Police
by Registered Post with Acknowledgment Due under Section 154(3), Cr.P.C.
iv If there is inaction on the part of the
Station House Officer and the Superintendent of Police, the complainant is at
liberty to move the jurisdictional Magistrate under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C.
v The complaint shall be given to the Magistrate
either in Tamil or in English in the form of a representation in first person
addressed directly to the Magistrate. vi The complaint shall be accompanied by
an affidavit as mandated by the Supreme Court in Priyanka Srivastava Case.
vii On receipt of the complaint, the Magistrate
shall pass orders thereon within 15 days, either issuing directions or
dismissing the petition.
viii If the Magistrate decides to order police
investigation, he should pass a judicial order to that effect in the record
sheet.
ix A copy of the order, together with original
complaint and copy of the affidavit, shall be forwarded by the Magistrate to
the jurisdictional police officer for investigation.
x If the police officer does not register FIR
within a period of one week from the date of receipt of the Magistrate's order,
the Magistrate shall initiate prosecution against him under Section 21 read
with Section 44 of the District Police Act before the Chief Metropolitan
Magistrate or the Chief Judicial Magistrate, as the case may be.
xi If no FIR is registered by the police within
one week from the date of receipt of a copy of the order of the Magistrate
under Section 156(3), Cr.P.C., the complainant can approach this Court under
Section 482, Cr.P.C.
xii If the police fail to complete the
preliminary enquiry within six weeks as mandated by the Supreme Court in Lalita
Kumari-V, the complainant can approach this Court under Article 144 read with
Section 482, Cr.P.C.
xiii The aforesaid petition under Article 144
read with Section 482, Cr.P.C. must be accompanied by an affidavit sworn to by
the complainant with satisfactory materials to show that the police have not
completed the preliminary enquiry within six weeks, as mandated by the Supreme
Court in Lalita Kumari-V. In such a petition, this Court will not read the
complaint, but, issue directions to the police to register an FIR on the
complaint for the very failure of the police to follow the mandates of Lalita
Kumari-IV and V. The Registry of this Court shall not number the petition filed
under Section 482, Cr.P.C. seeking a direction to register an FIR unless it is
accompanied by an affidavit containing the above details.
xiv In suitable cases, this Court shall also
direct disciplinary action to be taken against the police officer for the
violation of the mandates of Lalita Kumari - IV and V.
xv If the police officer fails to register the
FIR pursuant to the directions of this Court, he will be liable for contempt of
Court, besides facing disciplinary action.
xvi The aggrieved party can also approach the
local Legal Services Authority and the Authority shall take immediate steps to
ensure that an FIR is registered or CSR receipt issued to the complainant.
xvii Every police station shall have a board
giving the name and telephone number of the local Legal Services Authority
Sunday, May 12, 2019
Detenues who have completed more than three years in Assam Detention Centers should Be released: Supreme Court
Bench of Chief Justice Rajan Gogoi and Justice
Sanjiv Khanna was hearing the matter of foreigners kept in detention centers in
Assam in the case of Supreme Court Legal
Services Committee v. Union of India & Anr.. Court laid down the
following conditions for the release of detenues who have completed more than
three years of detention:
Execution of a bond with two sureties of Rs
1,00,000 (Rupees one lakh only) each of Indian citizens;
Specification of a verifiable address of stay
after release;
Biometric of his/her iris (if possible) and all
ten fingerprints and photos shall be captured and stored in a secured database
before release from the detention centres.
He or she shall report once every week to the
Police Station specified by the Foreigners Tribunal;
He or she shall notify any change of his or her
address to the specified Police Station on the same day, and ·
A quarterly report to be submitted by the
Superintendent of Police (Border) to the Foreigners Tribunal regarding
appearance of such released declared foreigner to concerned Police Station and
in case of violation of condition, the DFN will be apprehended and produced
before Foreigners Tribunal.
Court has further asked the State of Assam to
place on record a detailed scheme, in consultation with the Gauhati High Court
(on the administrative side), with regard to the constitution of Foreigners
Tribunals including appointment of Members, staff etc.
It has also asked for record of such details as
soon as possible while giving the State liberty to make a mention of the matter
before the Vacation Bench. Matter is to be listed in the month of July unless
mentioned otherwise by the counsel for the State.
Thursday, May 9, 2019
Whether statement recorded under section 161 Cr.P.C. can be treated as dying declaration?
The
Supreme court observed that statement recorded by the I.O. can be treated as
dying declaration under the provisions of section 32(1) of the Evidence Act and
is not hit by section 162 Cr.P.C.
(
Pradeep Bisoi @ Ranjit Bisoi vs State of Odisha, Crl Appeal 1192/2018 decided on 10-10-2018)
Saturday, May 4, 2019
Power of Court to monitor investigation
The magistrate on the application given by informant or suomoto pass an
order for monitoring of investigation being
conducted by the police officer. Such a power is vested in the Magistrate by
section 156(3) of the Cr.P.C. where a Magistrate can pass order for
registering FIR and conducting the
investigation.
In case of Sakiri Vasu vs State
of U.P. and others 2008(2) SCC 409, Supreme Court observed that “ the
magistrate has very wide powers under section 156(3) to direct registration of
FIR and to ensure a proper investigation and for this purpose he can monitor
the investigation to see that investigation is done properly though he himself
cannot investigate.
Whether monitoring of
investigation by the court will amount to interfering in the investigation?
In case of Union of India Vs Prakash Hinduja and anothers 2003 (6) SCC
195 , Supreme Court held that
Magistrate has no power to interfere in the investigation conducted by the
police. But in case of Sakir Vasu Supra the Supreme Court held that ratio of
this decision would only apply when proper
investigation is being done by the police and if magistrate is satisfied that
investigation is not being done properly he can certainly direct the
Officer-in-Charge of Police Station to conduct the investigation properly and can
further monitor the same.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Procedure of attachment, forfeiture and restoration of property derived from proceed of crime- A critical analysis
Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 ( BNSS) introduced new section 107 in Sanhita which was earlier not there in Cr.P.C.1974. The purpos...
-
Procedure for issuance of notices/order by police officers under Sections 41A Police officers should be mandatorily required to issue n...
-
Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 ( BNSS) introduced new section 107 in Sanhita which was earlier not there in Cr.P.C.1974. The purpos...
-
Section 84 of BNSS 2023 lays down the procedure for declaring a person accused of an offence, proclaimed offender. Procedure include...