Wednesday, April 17, 2024

Procedure of attachment, forfeiture and restoration of property derived from proceed of crime- A critical analysis

 

Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 ( BNSS) introduced new section 107 in Sanhita which was earlier not there in Cr.P.C.1974. The purpose of the section is to attach, forfeit the property derived from proceeds of crime and restore it the person/victim who are legally entitled to it.

Section 107 BNSS is complete code in itself and provides:-

(1) Where a police officer making an investigation has reason to believe that any property is derived or obtained, directly or indirectly, as a result of a criminal activity or from the commission of any offence, he may, with the approval of the Superintendent of Police or Commissioner of Police, make an application to the Court or the Magistrate exercising jurisdiction to take cognizance of the offence or commit for trial or try the case, for the attachment of such property.

(2) If the Court or the Magistrate has reasons to believe, whether before or after taking evidence, that all or any of such properties are proceeds of crime, the Court or the Magistrate may issue a notice upon such person calling upon him to show cause within a period of fourteen days as to why an order of attachment shall not be made.

(3) Where the notice issued to any person under sub-section (2) specifies any property as being held by any other person on behalf of such person, a copy of the notice shall also be served upon such other person.

(4) The Court or the Magistrate may, after considering the explanation, if any, to the show-cause notice issued under sub-section (2) and the material fact available before such Court or Magistrate and after giving a reasonable opportunity of being heard to such person or persons, may pass an order of attachment, in respect of those properties which are found to be the proceeds of crime:

 Provided that if such person does not appear before the Court or the Magistrate or represent his case before the Court or Magistrate within a period of fourteen days specified in the show-cause notice, the Court or the Magistrate may proceed to pass the ex parte order.

(5) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (2), if the Court or the Magistrate is of the opinion that issuance of notice under the said sub-section would defeat the object of attachment or seizure, the Court or Magistrate may by an interim order passed ex parte direct attachment or seizure of such property, and such order shall remain in force till an order under sub-section (6) is passed.

(6) If the Court or the Magistrate finds the attached or seized properties to be the proceeds of crime, the Court or the Magistrate shall by order direct the District Magistrate to rateably distribute such proceeds of crime to the persons who are affected by such crime.

(7) On receipt of an order passed under sub-section (6), the District Magistrate shall, within a period of sixty days distribute the proceeds of crime either by himself or authorise any officer subordinate to him to effect such distribution. 

(8) If there are no claimants to receive such proceeds or no claimant is ascertainable or there is any surplus after satisfying the claimants, such proceeds of crime shall stand forfeited to the Government.

The procedure mentioned above looks simple, but is not. Property derived from proceeds of crime need to be identified. Approval of S.P.or Commissioner of police is required for filling application in Court of Magistrate. Show cause notice to be served promptly, how it will be served not mentioned in section, theoretically procedure applicable for serving the summons will be followed in serving the show cause notice. In case of non-appearance only remedy is to proceed ex-party. Non appearance in the miscellaneous case registered under section 107 BNSS will not result in issue of warrant or proclamation.

Further a person who is not absconding, his property can be attached if found to be proceed of crime.

Though provision is made for rateable distribution of proceeds of crime rateably among the persons affected by the crime by DM within 60 days, it will be a challenge for investigating agency to find out the persons affected by the crime.

The section does not prescribe the procedure in case where immoveable property is proceed of crime. Presumably the DM will auction the property and distribute the proceeds of crime or if property has been taken wrongfully by the accused as proceeds of crime.

The person against whom the order under this section is issued will definitely approach the higher court by way of revision or writ as the case may be. But the fact is that the section if used in its right spirit will be a nightmare for those who are building properties from proceeds of crime whether by cyber crime or economic offences or chit fund scams or by extortion etc.


Sunday, April 14, 2024

Identification and attachment of property of proclaimed person in BNSS 2023

 


Section 84 of  BNSS 2023 lays down the procedure for declaring a person accused of an offence, proclaimed offender.  Procedure includes declaring absconding accused as proclaimed person in 84(1) BNSS followed by proclaimed offender  in 84(4) BNSS. Issue of proclamation as earlier in Cr.P.C. is subject to issue of warrant.

As usual if a proclaimed person/offender fails to appear before court or police, his property can be attached under section 85 BNSS ( 83 Cr.P.C.).

 Section 86 BNSS is newly added section which does not existed in Cr.P.C. and provides as under:-

Section 86:- Identification and attachment of property of proclaimed person

“ The court may, on the written request from a police officer not below the rank of Superintendent of Police or Commissioner of police , initiate the process of requesting assistance from a court or an authority in the  contracting State for identification, attachment and forfeiture of property belonging to a proclaimed person in accordance with the procedure provided in chapter VIII.”

Contracting State has been defined in section 111(a) of BNSS which provides that “ Contracting State means any country or place outside Indian in respect of which arrangements have been made by the Central Government with the Government of such country through a treaty or otherwise”

Chapter VIII of BNSS actually contain provisions for reciprocal arrangements with respect to execution of arrest warrants, summons, production of prisoner, attachment of property derived from proceeds of crime etc.

The attachment of property under section 86 BNSS is different than the attachment of property under section 85 BNSS, where the property is situated in India. Section 86 BNSS will come into operation where there is possibility that property of accused person may be outside the country in Contracting State.  

Section 86 is supplementary to section 85BNSS and can be used only after following the procedure of 84 BNSS. A written application is required to be submitted to court by the Superintendent of Police or Commissioner of police for initiating the process of section 86 BNSS.

 

 

Saturday, April 13, 2024

POWER OF POLICE TO SUMMON DOCUMENT OR THINGS DURING INVESTIGATION IN BNSS 2023

 

Section 91 of Cr.P.C. contained the provisions for production of document or things. The provision has been reproduced as Section 94 of Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023.

Section 94 of the BNSS provides that:-

 (1) Whenever any Court or any officer in charge of a police station considers that the production of any document, electronic communication, including communication devices, which is likely to contain digital evidence or other thing is necessary or desirable for the purposes of any investigation, inquiry, trial or other proceeding under this Sanhita  by or before such Court or officer, such Court may issue a summons or such officer may, by a written order, either in physical form or in electronic form, require the person in whose possession or power such document or thing is believed to be, to attend and produce it, or to produce it, at the time and place stated in the summons or order.

Earlier in section 91 Cr.P.C. the officer-in-charge or the court was empowered to issue order or summon to any person  to produce any document or thing necessary for investigation, inquiry, trial or other proceeding under Cr.P.C. Section 94 BNSS now empowers the officer-in-charge of police station and the court to issue order or summons to any person to produce any document or thing or electronic communication including the communication devices which is likely to contain digital evidence if such document or thing or electronic communication or communication device is necessary for investigation etc.

So as per the definition of electronic communication in  section 2(i) of BNSS a person may be asked to produce any  written, verbal, pictorial information or video content transmitted or transferred (whether from one person to another or from one device to another or from a person to a device or from a device to a person) by means of an electronic device including a telephone, mobile phone, or other wireless telecommunication device, or a computer, or audio-video player or camera or any other electronic device or electronic form.

Further he can also be asked to produce communication devices which is likely to contain digital evidence .

Hence , phone call records, e mail, facebook posts, messages, whatsapp messages, text messages, pictorial messages, GIFs,  uploaded or downloaded files, attachment , inbox messages, messages generated by machines, instagram messages or anything which is covered in the definition of electronic communication  can be asked under section 94 BNSS. Production of devices likely to contain digital evidence for example computers, laptops, cell phones, tablets, etc .can also be asked under this section.

The definition is illustrative not exhaustive and definition can be expended any time by Central Government by issuing a notification.

However the section 94 BNSS is not applicable to any letter, parcel  or document in the custody of postal authorities.

Section does not affect the provisions of section 129 and 130 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 or the Bankers' Books Evidence Act, 1891.

In State Of Bombay Vs Kathi Kalu Oghad   Air 1961 Sc 1808 Supreme Court held that provisions of section 91 does not apply to accused person.

In case of  State Of Orissa Vs Debendra Nath Padhi, Crl App 497/2001 decided On 29-11-2004 SC held that accused can also use the provision of 91 Cr.P.C. when he enters in his defence.

Intentional  omission to produce a document, electronic communication , communication device or any other thing as required by this section is punishable under section 210 of BNS 2023.

Monday, April 1, 2024

SUBSTANTIAL CHANGE IN PROCEDURE FOR DECLARING A PERSON ‘PROCLAIMED OFFENDER’

 

Procedure for declaring a person accused of an offence as proclaimed offender is being governed by the provisions of section 82 Cr.P.C. From 1/7/24 after BNSS 2023 will come in force, procedure prescribed in section 84 BNSS will be followed.

Section 84 (1) (2) (3)  BNSS contain the same provision as it was there in Section 82 (1) (2) (3) of Cr.P.C. which provided that:-

(1) If any Court has reason to believe (whether after taking evidence or not) that any person against whom a warrant has been issued by it has absconded or is concealing himself so that such warrant cannot be executed, such Court may publish a written proclamation requiring him to appear at a specified place and at a specified time not less than thirty days from the date of publishing such proclamation.

(2) The proclamation shall be published as follows:—

(i) (a) it shall be publicly read in some conspicuous place of the town or village in which such person ordinarily resides;

 (b) it shall be affixed to some conspicuous part of the house or homestead in which such person ordinarily resides or to some conspicuous place of such town or village;

(c) a copy thereof shall be affixed to some conspicuous part of the Court-house;

 (ii) the Court may also, if it thinks fit, direct a copy of the proclamation to be published in a daily newspaper circulating in the place in which such person ordinarily resides.

 (3) A statement in writing by the Court issuing the proclamation to the effect that the proclamation was duly published on a specified day, in the manner specified in clause (i) of sub-section (2), shall be conclusive evidence that the requirements of this section have been complied with, and that the proclamation was published on such day.

The change which has been brought by section 84 BNSS is specially in respect of declaring a person as proclaimed offender under sub section (4)  i.e. old section 82 (4) Cr.P.C.

In Cr.P.C.a person can be declared as proclaimed offender only if he commits any of the 19  offences mentioned in section  82 (4), however in BNSS any person who has committed an offence punishable with imprisonment of ten years or more , life imprisonment or death  whether under Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita  2023 or any other law for the time being in force can be declared as proclaimed offender  under section 84 (4) of BNSS 2023.

It is worthwhile to mention that in order to declare a person as proclaimed offender, first he should be declared as proclaimed person in 84(1) BNSS and if he fails to appear within the specified time, can be declared as Proclaimed Offender on the application of investigating officer, provided his case falls under sub-section 4 of section 84 BNSS.

If a person against whom a proclamation has been issued under section 84(1) or 84(4) of BNSS fails to appear before the court within specified time, he commits an offence under section 209 of BNS 2023 which is cognizable and non-bailable offence, punishable with imprisonment for 3 and 7 years  respectively.

*****

Saturday, March 30, 2024

Changes in Procedure of Arrest from 1/7/24

 

Changes in Arrest Procedure from 1/7/24

Since Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 will come in force on 1/7/24, it will bring following changes in Arrest procedure and provisions relating to arrest.

1. Section 35 to section 62 of BNSS 2023 contains law relating to arrest.

2. Old section 41 and 41 A Cr.P.C. have become one section i.e. 35 of BNSS 2023.

3. Power to arrest in 35 (1), Power to issue notice in 35 (3) BNSS 2023

4 . Earlier there was no format in Cr.P.C. for issuing notice of 41 A Cr.P.C., now  Form No.1 of BNSS 2023 to be used in issuing notice of 35 (3).

5. Prior permission of police officer not below the rank of Dy.S.P is required to arrest a person in cases where offence is punishable with imprisonment for a term of less than three years and person is infirm or above the age of sixty years.

6. Designated police officer:-  Section 37 BNSS makes provision for appointment of Designated Police officer not below the rank of Assistant Sub-Inspector in every police station. He will maintain the data of every arrested person for ex. his name, address , offence with which he is charged. The data will be displayed in digital or physical mode at police station and district police headquarter.

As per section 48 BNSS the police officer or private person making arrest is bound to give information of arrest to the designated police officer of the police station of the district where such relative/ friend or nominated person resides. In a scenario where a case is registered at one police station, arrest is made in another police station and relative/friend resides in jurisdiction of another police station, the information to be given to designated police officers of every police station.

7. Production of arrested person where arrest is made by private person:-  In case of arrest by private person, the arrested person shall be handovered or cause to be handovered to nearest police officer or police station within six hours as per section 40 BNSS . Earlier there was no time limit was fixed by section 43 Cr.P.C. A private person who willfully caused delay in handovering the arrested person within the prescribed time limit may be charged under section 127 of BNS 2023.

8. Use of Handcuffs :- Earlier in section 46 of Cr.P.C. there was no provision for use of Handcuffs. Now section 43 (3) BNSS list out the case where handcuffs can be used. It includes case of habitual or repeat offender, or person who escaped from custody, organized crime, terrorist acts, drug related crime, illegal possession of arms and ammunition, murder, rape, acid attack counterfeiting of coins and currency notes, human trafficking, sexual offences against children or offences against the State. However the provision is not mandatory in nature, it grants discretionary power to the officer making arrest.

9. Medical examination of arrested person:- Earlier medical examination was supposed to be done on the request of police officer not below the rank of sub-inspector as per section 53,53 A and 54 of Cr.P.C.  This restriction has been removed by BNSS in section 51, 52 and 53 BNSS now medical examination request can be made by police officer of any rank.

*****

Friday, March 29, 2024

Changes in policing from 1-7.2024 - Part 1

 

CHANGE IN POLICING FROM 1ST JULY 2024

1.a. Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 will repeal Criminal Procedure Code 1973.

b. Indian Penal Code will be repealed by Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita 2023

c. Indian Evidence Act 1872 will be repealed by Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023

d.  All the State Amendments in above laws will come to an end.

e. Cases registered before 1/7/24 will be inquired/investigated/tried as per Cr.P.C.1973

f. Cases registered from 1/7/24 will be  investigated/ inquired/tried as per BNSS 2023.

Changes in FIR

1. FIR will be registered under section 173 BNSS 2023.

2. FIR can be registered in any police station. Jurisdiction will not be essential factor for registering FIR.

3. Information regarding commission of cognizable offence can be given by electronic communication which includes :-

  The communication of any written, verbal, pictorial information or video content

  Transmitted or transferred (whether from one person to another or from one device to another or from a person to a device or from a device to a person)

  By means of an electronic device including a telephone, mobile phone, or other wireless telecommunication device, or a computer, or audio-video player or camera or any other electronic device or electronic form as may be specified by notification, by the central government.

4. The officer-in-charge of the police station shall take the information on record. The informant shall sign the information within three days.

5. If the information is given by the woman against whom an offence under section 64, section 65, section 66, section 67, section 68, section 69, section 70, section 71, section 74, section 75, section 76, section 77, section 78, section 79 or section 124 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 is alleged to have been committed or attempted, then such information shall be recorded, by a woman police officer or any woman officer:

6. In the event that the person against whom an offence under section 64, section 65, section 66, section 67, section 68, section 69, section 70, section 71, section 74, section 75, section 76, section 77, section 78, section 79 or section 124 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 is alleged to have been committed or attempted, is temporarily or permanently mentally or physically disabled, then such information shall be recorded by a police officer, at the residence of the person seeking to report such offence or at a convenient place of such person's choice, in the presence of an interpreter or a special educator, as the case may be.

7. Copy of First Information recorded is to be given to victim or informant.

8. In cognizable offences punishable with three years or more but less than 7 years the officer-in-charge of police station may conduct the preliminary enquiry with prior permission of police officer not below the rank of Dy.S.P.

9. Preliminary Enquiry to be completed  within 14 days.

9. In case FIR is not registered by the Officer-in-charge of police station, and no action is taken by Superintendent of Police after being approached by the informant, he may file an application in the court of Judicial Magistrate.

Questions unanswered.

If informant giving information by electronic communication, does not come for signing it, within three days?

Preliminary Enquiry where the cognizable offence is punishable with less than three years or seven years or more?

Whether Judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in Lalita Kumari vs State of U.P.  (2014) 2 SCC 1, still relevant?

******

Friday, October 13, 2023

THE ASSAM WITCH HUNTING ( PROHIBITION, PREVENTION AND PROTECTION ) ACT 2015

 

In order to provide for more effective measures to prohibit. witch hunting and prevent and protect persons from witch hunting and to eliminate torture, oppression, humiliation and killing of such persons by a section of the society by providing for punishment by trial of offences relating to witch hunting; and, for the relief and rehabilitation of victims of such offences, the Assam Government has passed ‘The Assam Witch Hunting (PPP) Act 2015.

The Act came into force on 01/10/2018

The act provides stringent punishment for various offences under this Act. offences include punishment for identifying, calling witch, causing death, abating suicide, outraging the modesty, torture, damaging reputation, etc.

All offences of this Act are cognizable, non-bailable and non-compoundable.

The Act provides for rehabilitation grants to victim or next of kins and contain preventive measure to be adopted by the police officers.

Section 30 of the Act makes section 438 Cr.P.C. not applicable for offence of this Act.

Thursday, October 12, 2023

Rights of the Dead persons:- NHRC advisory

 NHRC in its advisory has enumerated the various rights of dead persons which are as follows:-

A. International Framework

Human dignity lies at the core of all international human rights laws. Some of the international covenants and laws that deal specifically with the dignity of the dead are given below:

1. Article 16 (II paragraph) of Geneva Convention 1949 IV provides “As far as military consideration allows, each party to the conflict shall facilitate the steps taken to protect the killed against ill treatments”.

2. Article 3 (a) of the 1990 Cairo declaration on Human Rights in Islam provides “In the event of the use of force and in case of armed conflict- it is prohibited to mutilate dead bodies”.

3. UN Commission on Human Rights in a Resolution adopted in 2005, underlined the importance of dignified handling of human remains, including their proper management and disposal as well as of respect for the needs of families.

4. The UN’s Inter Agency Standing Committee’s Operational Guidelines on Human Rights and Natural Disasters recommend that appropriate measures should be taken ‘to facilitate the return of remains to the next of kin. Measures should allow for the possibility of recovery of human remains for future identification and reburial if required’.

5. International humanitarian law [Article 130(1) of the fourth Geneva Convention] provides that States should ensure that ‘graves are respected, properly maintained, and marked in such a way that they can always be recognized’.

 

B. National Framework

Article 21 of the Indian Constitution which guarantees the Right to Life, embraces many aspects of a person’s life including Right to Dignity. By various judgments of the Supreme Court and High Courts, this right has been extended to dead persons also.

1. Supreme Court Cases:

i. In the case of Parmanand Katara v. Union of India, 1989 (W. P. (Crl) No. 270 of 1988, SCC (4) 286), the Supreme Court highlighted the importance of conferring dignity to dead persons. Again, it was reiterated by Apex Court in the case of Ashray Adhikar Abhiyan v. Union of India, 2002 (W. P. (C) 143 of 2001), that dignity of the dead must be maintained and respected. Moreover, it extended the right to the homeless deceased person to have a decent cremation according to the religious customs to which one belongs to, it also established a corresponding duty on the State to ensure that decent cremation is served to the person.

ii. In P. Rathinam v. Union of India, 1994 (SCC (3) 394), the ambit of article 21 was widened to include the dignity of a person. It emphasized that the right to life means a meaningful life and not merely animal existence. Further, this right to dignity was also expanded to a dead person.

2. High Court Cases:

i. In the case of S. Sethu Raja v. Chief Secretary, 2007 (W.P. (MD) No. 3888 of 2007), the Madras High Court directed the Government authorities to bring the dead body from Malaysia, so that burial can take place at home according to traditions and customs.

ii. Ramji Singh and Mujeeb Bhai Vs. State of U.P. & Ors, 2010 (PIL) No.- 38985 of 2004) – In this case the Allahabad High Court contended that a person’s right to life includes the right of  the dead body to be treated with the same respect that he would have deserved if he were alive.

It is imperative for the State to treat the corpse with dignity, and must only resort to postmortem if it is a necessity.

3. Provisions under Indian Penal Code, 1860: Under the IPC, 1860, the rights of deceased persons include Right against trespass of burial sites, places of funeral rites, etc. under Section 297; Right against dishonest misappropriation and conversion of property under Section 404; Right against defamation under Section 499 and Right against criminal intimidation under Section 503.

4. Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act, 1994 (THOTA): The THOTA regulates the removal, storage and transplantation of human organs and tissues for therapeutic purposes for preventing commercial dealings in human organs and tissues as well as matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. THOTA guarantees a deceased person the right to protect and preserve the human organs or tissue or both of the dead body from being harvested without his/ her consent or the consent of near relatives.

II. Basic Principles for Upholding the Dignity and Protecting the Rights of the Dead

1. No discrimination in treatment of the body in any form- To ensure that the dead body is properly preserved and handled irrespective of religion, region, caste, gender, etc.

 

2. No physical exploitation- Any form of physical exploitation of the body of the dead violates the basic right of the deceased person.

3. Decent and timely burial/ cremation- The deceased person has the right to a decent and timely burial/ cremation.

4. To receive justice, in case of death due to crime- The dead have the right to receive justice in cases where death occurs due to crime.

5. To carry out a legal will- The will, if any, left by the dead must be respected and honoured.

6. No defamation after death- The deceased person should not be defamed by any kind of statement or visible representation, made or published intending to harm his/her reputation.

7. No breach of privacy- The deceased person has the right to privacy, i.e., the right to control the dissemination of information about one’s privacy.

III. Role and Responsibilities of the Stakeholders Towards Upholding the Dignity and Protecting the Rights of the Dead

1. Citizen:

i. Duty to inform: It should be the duty of every citizen to inform, after noticing any incident of death, immediately to the nearest police station and/or to emergency ambulance services or the administrative/ legal authorities, whichever feasible.

ii. Carrying procession: Citizens should not use the dead bodies as baits for pursuing their demands, etc.

2. Hospital Administration:

i. Clothing of the dead body: Clothing of the deceased should be collected, examined as well as preserved and sealed by the doctor conducting the autopsy, and should be sent for further examination at the concerned forensic science laboratory. Further, it should be covered in special Body Bags for proper transportation.

ii. Storage of unclaimed bodies: The unclaimed bodies must be stored under safe conditions in the deep freezer to prevent any decay or damage to the dead bodies.

iii. Segregation and arrangement of the dead bodies: It must be ensured that the bodies are segregated based on gender and are kept in a dignified manner by avoiding piling up.

iv. Release of dead bodies: The Hospital administration should be explicitly prohibited from deliberately retaining any dead body on the count of pending bill payment. The hospitals must hand over the body to the family of the deceased or to the civic body (if it is an unclaimed body) in a dignified way.

v. Licensure for use of unclaimed bodies: Hospitals that utilise the unclaimed bodies for academic, research and training of the medical students must have valid license for the same.

3. Medical Practitioners

i. Implementation of the ethical guidelines of ICMR: All the medical practitioners must follow the guidelines of the ICMR while dealing with the claimed as well as unclaimed dead bodies.

ii. Announcement of the death: After death, it must be officially pronounced/ declared by a doctor without any delay.

 

4. Forensic Department and Practitioners:

i. Trained and qualified professionals: Only the trained and qualified professional in forensic medicine should perform the autopsy procedure and the use of inappropriate tools such as a hammer, etc. should be avoided.

ii. Video-filming and photography of post-mortem examination: In case of custodial death where there is a requirement of post-mortem examination, NHRC guidelines for video-filming and photography should be complied with accordingly.

iii. Handing over the body to the family: It must be ensured that the external appearance of the deceased and the incisions on the body must be hidden by clothes while handing over the body to the family/relatives.

iv. Timely post-mortem: It must be ensured that the post mortem examination is done without any delay so that funeral arrangements are not delayed

v. Protection of personal and genetic information: Genetic data obtained through DNA profiling must be handled carefully and confidentially as the same may be required to trace the identity of the unclaimed dead bodies. For this, data banks should be properly maintained to store the genetic data and biological samples of the unclaimed bodies, as per the existing laws.

5. Mortuary Services:

i. Mortuary hygiene: Regular mopping and cleaning of mortuary should be undertaken so that dead body remains are preserved in a proper, clean environment, thereby maintaining its dignity.

ii. Secured information: The facility should maintain confidentiality of clinical records and must have a mechanism for guarding information related to the deceased, especially for cases that are stigmatized and socially criticised, such as that of HIV and suicidal cases.

iii. Maintaining privacy of premises: Post mortem room should not come under the direct line of sight of the general public/visitors. To ensure the same, provision of curtain, screen or buffer area may be made in a post mortem room.

iv. Removing physical/ infrastructural barriers: The facility must have infrastructure for delivery of assured services, to meet the prescribed norms. All basic requirements must be available and maintained as per the Indian Public Health Standard Guidelines for District Hospitals for management of the dead bodies.

v. Sensitization of the staff: The mortuary administration may sensitize the staff from time to time to train them in handling of the dead body and deal with the attendants of the deceased with sensitivity.

6. Governments

A - Central/ State Government:

i. Digitization of data: Each State must maintain a district wise digital dataset of death cases. A dynamic web portal for displaying data for both identified and unidentified bodies must be created and it must be the responsibility of the State to ensure protection of such data.

ii. Digital confirmation of the death of a person must be simultaneously updated in all documents such as Bank Account, Aadhar Card, Insurance etc., wherever applicable, to prohibit the scope of any impersonation or illegal monetary transaction gains.

iii. 24x7 Helpline: Whenever there is any calamity or disaster or major accident, etc., leading to deaths of persons being away from family, the Government should create a 24x7 Helpline facility to help the families of deceased persons for collection of body or to report any grievance regarding any unethical behavior such as assault or any inhuman conduct with the body of the deceased.

iv. Opting partial autopsy methods: The Government/ National Medical Commission may consider to adopt a partial autopsy method in cases where the complete autopsy is not necessary, arrangements of techniques, experts and training of the forensic experts shall be conducted to promote advanced methods of autopsy.

v. Availability of equipment for post-mortem: The State should ensure the arrangements of standardized instruments at all forensic medicine departments for effective conduct of postmortem procedure.

vi. Preparation of SOP: State Governments should make their own SOPs, as required, to ensure dignity of the dead, taking into account the specific practices, rituals, customs, etc., followed in their respective States/ regions.

B - Local Government/ Administration:

i. Ensuring appropriate disposal of the dead body: In the event of legal heirs disowning the body and depriving it of a decent burial, the local Government / civic body should ensure proper disposal of the body after due legal procedures like post-mortem etc.

ii. Donation of organs by the deceased: The law should be amended to the effect that the will of the deceased regarding the organ donation is given prime importance irrespective of the opinion of the legal heir.

iii. Maintenance of burial grounds/ crematoriums: It must be ensured by the State/ Local Government that the condition of crematoriums, burial grounds, electric crematoriums are properly maintained to keep them in effective working conditions.

iv. Encouraging electric cremation methods: Environment friendly cremation practices like the usage of electric crematoriums may be encouraged, which would also reduce the burden on the existing burial grounds/ crematoriums.

v. Periodic inspections: The local government bodies should visit the local hospitals to ensure the compliance of the guidelines in management of the claimed or unclaimed dead bodies.

vi. Transportation of the dead bodies: The local authorities should ensure that the transportation facilities are available to transport the body of the deceased at the request of family members.

vii. In case of unidentified dead bodies: The last rites of unidentified dead bodies should be performed with honor and dignity while taking their religion into consideration. The necessary fund required for this purpose may be adequately maintained.

viii. Maintenance of database: Local government/ District Registrar of deaths should maintain the database of deaths in the district.

7. Police:

i. No delay in post mortem: The Police administration should ensure that there is no undue delay in calling a forensic team to the crime scene and in transferring the body of the deceased for postmortem examination. Transfer of the dead body to the hospital administration and submission of the complete inquest form should be done within the stipulated period of time.

ii. Handling of the dead body: In cases where death occurs due to fire accidents, self- immolation, murders, death due to sexual offences, custodial deaths, suicides, road and other accidents, the body of the deceased must be covered, handled with respect and sent to mortuary immediately for performing the autopsy procedures.

iii. Identification of the dead bodies: For identification of the dead bodies, labelling of a unique body code, technical photographs, other data from the dead bodies may be collected and stored under the police record for identification and further transfer of the dead body to the family.

iv. Availability of body bags & basic forensic kits: ‘Body bags and basic forensic kits to be made available at police stations to maintain the sanctity of the body and collection of evidence from the incident site, if it is a case of  homicide/accident/unnatural death.

v. Keeping the dead bodies in the mortuary: It may be ensured that the dead bodies do not remain in the mortuary for more than 72 hours. In case of an unidentified body, the Police should make serious efforts for its identification and disposal accordingly in a dignified manner.

vi. Photography: Video-filming and photography of the post-mortem examination should be done by a person trained in forensic photography and videography.

8. Prison

i. Custodial death: In case of death inside prison, as per section 176 (1A) CrPC, the prison officials shall inform the Judicial Magistrate for judicial enquiry on the cause of death. The family of the deceased should also be informed simultaneously.

ii. Dignified treatment: In case of death in custody, the body must be covered and handled in a dignified manner while sending it to the forensic department/ hospital without delay for performing the autopsy procedures.

9. Family:

i. Donation of the organs, tissues or cells: If the deceased had consented to the donation of the organs, tissues or cells, it should be honored and implemented accordingly.

ii. Death registration: The death of a person should be registered by the family members as soon as possible so as to avoid any kind of misuse of his identity for claiming any kind of benefit by an unauthorised person.

10. Media:

i. Right to privacy and dignity: Media including social media must avoid explicit photographs or videos of dead bodies from being shown to the common public and must use masking techniques wherever the dead body is shown, so as to ensure that the right to privacy and dignity of the deceased person is not compromised.

ii. No derogatory remarks: Personal remarks or comments which are derogatory in nature, hampering the dignity of a dead person, should not be published.

11. Civil Society Organizations and NGOs:

The CSOs/NGOs should come forward to take up the responsibility of performing last rites of the unclaimed and unattended bodies in dignified manner.

Friday, September 23, 2022

Police officers to be careful while counting 60/90/120 or 180 days time limit for submission of police report as the case may be-

 

With the new concept of House arrest and transit remand the Supreme Court in case of of Gautam Navlakha vs NIA decided on 12/5/2021, the days spend in House arrest which was earlier not recognized in Cr.P.C. and time spend in Transit remand will be calculated in computing 60/90 days as case may be, if a police officer is unaware about this, may result in granting default bail to the person in custody.

 

Sunday, August 21, 2022

INVESTIGATING OFFICER PUNISHED WITH 14 DAYS IMPRISONMENT FOR CIRCUMVENTING /BY PASSING THE MANDATE OF SUPREME COURT IN ARNESH KUMAR CASE

 Allahabad  High Court  in case of contempt petition  In Re Chandan Kumar held that "This Court would not lose sight of the fact that the contemnor, being a member of disciplined Force, in exercise of his powers of arrest, has willfully and deliberately bypassed the mandate of the Supreme Court in Arnesh Kumar (supra), which is binding on all the authorities, including, the Magistrate, in view of Article 141 of the Constitution of India.

It has been noted by the Court in the order dated 04.08.2022, that the contemnor, though, has served a notice under Section 41-A Cr.P.C. on the accused, but, to bypass the mandate of the Supreme Court, he willfully and deliberately recorded in the GD that accused declined to accept the terms and condition of the notice. Further, communal colour was attempted to be given by the contemnor taking advantage that the accused belongs to a muslim community, by stating that there was an apprehension of communal riots. It is noted in the order that no such apprehension did exist as admittedly, the FIR was not lodged at the police station until intervention by the higher authorities. There is no entry in the GD that there was any such apprehension of communal flare up in the event of the accused not being arrested. The misleading entry in the GD was made willfully and deliberately with sole purpose to bypass the mandate in Arnesh Kumar (supra), in order to arrest the accused. The contemnor, in the circumstances, has circumvent the mandate which was binding upon him. In the event of the Court taking a sympathetic view, it would not sub-serve public interest and the administration of justice. In order to secure public respect and confidence in the judicial process, the Court is constrained in awarding punishment to the contemnor, Investigating Officer, Shri Chandan Kumar, Incharge of Police Station, Kanth, District Shahjahanpur, for committing contempt. In the circumstances, Shri Chandan Kumar, Incharge of Police Station, Kanth, District Shahjahanpur, is sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for 14 days and fine is imposed at Rs. 1000/-. On default, the contemnor shall undergo one week further simple imprisonment

Monday, July 18, 2022

1- NON COMPLIANCE OF SECTION 41 AND 41 A CR.P.C - SUPREME COURT JUDGMENT

 NON COMPLIANCE OF SECTION 41 AND 41 A CR.P.C - Courts should come heavily on police officer making arrest in contravention of the provisions of section 41 and 41 Cr.P.C.

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973; Section 41 - Scope - Even for a cognizable offense, an arrest is not mandatory as can be seen from the mandate of this provision

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973; Sections 41, 41A - The courts will have to satisfy themselves on the compliance of Section 41 and 41A of the Code. Any non-compliance would entitle the accused for grant of bail - The investigating agencies and their officers are duty-bound to comply with the mandate of Section 41 and 41A of the Code and the directions issued in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar, (2014) 8 SCC 273 - Any dereliction on their part has to be brought to the notice of the higher authorities by the court followed by appropriate action - State Governments and the Union Territories to facilitate standing orders for the procedure to be followed under Section 41 and 41A of the Code.

We also expect the courts to come down heavily on the officers effecting arrest without due compliance of Section 41 and Section 41A. We express our hope that the Investigating Agencies would keep in mind the law laid down in Arnesh Kumar (Supra), the discretion to be exercised on the touchstone of presumption of innocence, and the safeguards provided under Section 41, since an arrest is not mandatory. If discretion is exercised to effect such an arrest, there shall be procedural compliance. Our view is also reflected by the interpretation of the specific provision under Section 60A of the Code which warrants the officer concerned to make the arrest strictly in accordance with the Code.

Arrested person is entitled for bail ff the provisions of 41 and 41 A Cr.P.C. is not followed.

No need of forwarding the accused in custody u/s 170 . police report can be submitted to the court without forwarding the accused.

SATENDER KUMAR ANTIL versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION & ANR.

MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO.1849 OF 2021 IN SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL.) NO.5191 OF 2021 decided on 11/7/22 Supreme Court

Thursday, June 23, 2022

Requirement of certificate under section 65 B of the Indian Evidence Act 1872.

 

Referring to the decision of Supreme Court in case of Arjun Panditrao khotkar  vs Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal( 2020) 7 SCC 1 court further reiterated that “ certificate under section 65B is a condition precedent to the admissibility of electronic evidence as correctly held in Anvar P V vs P K Basher & ors ( 2014) 10 SCC 473and overruled the law laid down in case of  Shafi Mohammad vs  State of Himachal Pradesh (2018) 2SCC 801. ( Ravinder Singh vs State of Punjab 2022 (2)( Crimes) 2 43 SC)

Wednesday, May 11, 2022

FIRs not to be registered under section 124 A IPC till the time Law is being re-examined:- Supreme Court

 

While examining section 124 A of the IPC a three Judges Bench of Hon’ble Supreme Court stayed the operation of section 124 A IPC and issued following directions: -

Therefore, we expect that, till the re-examination of the provision is complete, it will be appropriate not to continue the usage of the aforesaid provision of law by the Governments.

 In view of the clear stand taken by the Union of India, we deem it appropriate to pass the following order in the interest of justice:

 a. The interim stay granted in W.P.(Crl.)No.217/2021 along with W.P.(Crl.)No.216/2021 vide order dated 31.05.2021 shall continue to operate till further orders.

 b. We hope and expect that the State and Central Governments will restrain from registering any FIR, continuing any investigation or taking any coercive measures by invoking Section 124A of IPC while the aforesaid provision of law is under consideration.

c. If any fresh case is registered under Section 124A of IPC, the affected parties are at liberty to approach the concerned Courts for appropriate relief. The Courts are requested to examine the reliefs sought, taking into account the present order passed as well as the clear stand taken by the Union of India.

 d. All pending trials, appeals and proceedings with respect to the charge framed under Section 124A of IPC be kept in abeyance. Adjudication with respect to other Sections, if any, could proceed if the Courts are of the opinion that 5 no prejudice would be caused to the accused.

e. In addition to the above, the Union of India shall be at liberty to issue the Directive as proposed and placed before us, to the State Governments/Union Territories to prevent any misuse of Section 124A of IPC.

f. The above directions may continue till further orders are passed.

Reference: - WRIT PETITION(C) No.682 OF 2021 S.G. VOMBATKERE … PETITIONER Versus UNION OF INDIA … RESPONDENT order dated 11/05/22 Supreme Court

Procedure of attachment, forfeiture and restoration of property derived from proceed of crime- A critical analysis

  Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 ( BNSS) introduced new section 107 in Sanhita which was earlier not there in Cr.P.C.1974. The purpos...